Gig review of Jon Gomm + Tim Canfer

Gig Date: Saturday, 15th May 2004 | 514 page views.

Jon Gomm @ Royal Park Cellars

By John Harvey

Playing acoustic guitar before Jon Gomm must be a rather daunting experience but Tim knocks out quite a strong set of songs with confessional and indeed rather poetic lyrics with fresh sounding strummy guitar.

The first song is a catchy number with the line "One more time" in the chorus. The crowd undoubtedly warm to the guy, his tall frame and laidback demeanour remind me of what a twenty-something Evan Dando might have sounded like if he lived in a bedsit in Leeds. Tim seems like a promising talent and I'm sure he's one to watch out for...

Onto Jon Gomm. When Bruce Lee talked of having "No style" he wasn't talking about the yellow tracksuits, he was talking of accomplishing mastery of the most effective parts from each martial art until you have a style that isn't bound to a particular set of rules. A style that is invincible that could decimate any man on the planet, a style that was ultimately entirely his own.

I have to say I think guitar virtuosos are generally really shit to listen to, there are only two exceptions to this and one of them is Jon Gomm. Jon's music works on all three levels from the technical skill on offer along with the accessibility of the tunes to the very down-to-earth deliverance.

Indeed he's the closest musician I have ever heard in achieving Lee's blueprint via music. He is a master musician that you can't define as a particular type or style since he incorporates countless approaches until it becomes nothing you've heard before - which is no mean feat considering he's only using an acoustic guitar.

The opening song is a cover of Bob Marley's "Wait In Vain". It's great just watching this guy he starts off playing for a few seconds armed with his well-beaten guitar he strums away... I look away for a few seconds and all of a sudden there's percussion and a bit of thumping bass and you see it and just don't know what to say!

He pins the crowd to their seat while their mouths open wide gaping. The applause gets more feverish after each song. I know that I'm seeing something really special tonight.

Like most men I can only do one thing at a time so how does this guy do three or four? The melodies are sweet, plenty of choruses and the percussion sounds exotic-from a far away place on the other side of the world.

Jon's original material stands out-its bold and strong I remember especially liking 'Hey Child'. Mid-way through the set he covers the Beatles 'Come Together' and Jon's voice really comes to the fore as he projects it and makes the song his own stretching out the chords.

Jon's reputation rightfully appears to be growing so it can only be a matter of time before he reaches a wider audience.

Find related articles: , , , , .

Comments

performingchimp wrote...

Now THAT is a well written, expertly observed and insightful review.

Profile | Posted 18th May 2004 at 00:15   back to article

Sam Robson wrote...

you're right.

I saw you in wakey...you should sell a dvd as well as a cd jon.

Profile | Posted 18th May 2004 at 15:07   back to article

Joseph_Royds wrote...

I agree. I saw Jon Gomm in The Snooty Fox in Wakefield and he has to be seen to be believed. Someone played me his CD before I saw him and said "This is all one take - no overdubs" "Yeh right" I said, but it's true - Breathtaking.

Profile | Posted 24th May 2004 at 14:23   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

"I have to say I think guitar virtuosos are generally really shit to listen to" is a flippant and personal observation, I know - but it is a deeply ignorant comment for someone who is about to describe a guitarist ... John McLaughlin? Ry Cooder? Django Reinhardt? Narciso Yepes? Julian Bream? Tony McPhee? Chuck Berry? Richard Thompson? Nick Jones? Keith Richards? None of these ring a bell? The stuff about Jon being completely original is not 100% right either - there are distinct precendents that a well-informed review should mention. The fact that the reviewer hasn't heard of Michael Hedges isn't surprising, but it is a warning to all us reviewers that there's more we don't know than we do know - every time. Jon is very very very good - no question. But my observation of many guitar bands at local and national level leaves me with a feeling that we accept mediocre playing of a glorious instrument far too easily.

Profile | Posted 24th May 2004 at 14:47   back to article

performingchimp wrote...

Sadly, nobody has heard of Michael Hedges. I often used to ask the audience at gigs if anyone had heard of him. The one time someone said yes was because they'd thought I'd said Michael Hutchence. Your description of Keith Richards as a virtuoso is amusing, Sam. He is great, but you have to allow a term to have a meaning and not say "yes, but he can be a virtuoso because of his cool, sparsely perfect rhythm work". A virtuoso in musical terms has to equate to the difficulty of the parts being performed. Commonly known as "fretwank". I am a fretwanker, Keith isn't. He wishes. (JOKE) It would be hard for me to be completely original either, unless I let my cat play guitar or something, and he only knows three chords. Anyhow Sam - have you ever seen me play? If so when and why didn't you say hello? If not, then you're presumably judging by my CD, and not by the gig, so it's not really fair to comment on a gig review. Except on the quality of the writing in general.

Profile | Posted 25th May 2004 at 14:00   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

No, I put KR in because he does that simple rock n roll thing so well. It's a kind of virtuosity - but if this was an exam I wouldn't be pushing his case. And I would hate anyone to think I was saying you were a Hedges "copyist" or anything - I was just making a loose reference back to a comment of yours about reviewers needing to have some expertise - and using a chance bit of knowledge I had to show that we can all be faulted in our reviewing. I look forward to coming to one of your shows before too long!

Profile | Posted 25th May 2004 at 15:23   back to article

Guided By Voices wrote...

Sam this is the 2nd review of mine that you've nit picked in as many months, I've also noticed you do it to other lesser established reviewers than yourself.

Yes my reviewers are often personal and at times flippant. When I said virtuoso I was talking about people like Steve Vai and Joe Satriani NOT the likes of Keith Richards. I didn't say that Jon was 100% original as you stated I said: "He is a master musician that you can't define as a particular type or style since he incorporates countless approaches until it becomes nothing you've heard before". The fact that you've made those comments without actually having seen him yourself is ludicrious.
I suggest that you review his next gig for the site and see if you can do a better job.

Profile | Posted 26th May 2004 at 22:18   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

Complaining about nit picking by nit picking is a bit weird. Never mind, here goes some more nit picking. You mention your line "until it becomes nothing you've heard before". Well, when I heard Jon's LP (I assume he doesn't play completely different music at live gigs) I was delighted by it - but I was also reminded of something I had heard before. Jon himself responded to the review by saying it was very well written (having complained in other responses that reviewers were not expert enough). So I wasn't making a critical comment about you in that observation - it was a general point aimed at Jon that no reviewers - not you, not me - can ever know enough to be really expert. We give our personal reposnse. Your observation that guitar virtuosos are shit to listen to was dumb, though, and I don't think you can defend it by saying that when you use a word you have a private meaning for it. If you mean Steve Vai and Joe Satriani you should say Steve Vai and Joe Satriani. Whether I was at the gig or not has nothing to do with that. In general I think you did an excellent job.

Profile | Posted 27th May 2004 at 09:51   back to article

performingchimp wrote...

I was being a bit silly when I said how well-written the review was, I was just making a joke cos it was about me. But I have read some old reviews by the same guy, and they also seem to be very good. Maybe they just give me what I want from a review - a clear and readable description of the music, and a considered opinion. My one criticism would be that sometimes you don't review all the acts. You are under no obligation to, but promoters often feel they should charge you £1 to get in if it's a £3 tax and you only review 2 acts. But there is the old last bus problem that Sam's mentioned before.

Anyhow, in general Sam thinks you did an excellent job. He's nit-picking me, not you (i.e. he's continuing our earlier debate). Sam will also argue that Keith Richards is a virtuoso until he's blue in the face, I suspect. I put it to you that Keef is a virtuoso drug-taker.

Profile | Posted 27th May 2004 at 11:47   back to article

Mike_Q wrote...

VIRTUOSO
A musician with masterly ability, technique, or personal style.
A person with masterly skill or technique in the arts.
A person with a strong interest in the fine arts, especially in antiquities.
Archaic. A very learned person.

adj.
Exhibiting the ability, technique, or personal style of a virtuoso: a virtuoso performance.

Keef can't play a million miles an hour but if you read the dictionary definitions above surely you can't argue that he fits in to the category of being a virtuoso, given his mastery of rhythm guitar work. Johnny Marr is a virtuoso too just as well as Vai, Hendrix, Sambora, Page, May, Schencker et al are. I think maybe the idea of a virtuoso being a shit hot soloist comes from the term's use within classical music. Really though it's just a person who is a master of his art form. Sam is a virtuoso of the English language, Jon is a virtuoso of sounding like ten men playing guitar on stage, I am a virtuoso of pulling silly faces when I drum.

Profile | Posted 27th May 2004 at 12:39   back to article

Mike_Q wrote...

Does anyone else hate it how there is no formatting on this thing! I want paragraphs goddamn it !

Profile | Posted 27th May 2004 at 12:40   back to article

performingchimp wrote...

I suppose, but it's my USP, I have to defend it. Those who hate me do so because they know my secret plan is to legitimise fretwank. I wouldn't call Keef a virtuoso to his face.

Profile | Posted 27th May 2004 at 19:04   back to article

performingchimp wrote...

And yes, I want paragraphs. Why can't we have html?

Profile | Posted 27th May 2004 at 19:05   back to article

Mike_Q wrote...

Is that Steve Kind's alter ego?

Profile | Posted 28th May 2004 at 00:53   back to article

Guided By Voices wrote...

Sam your reply seemed to elude a response regarding the challange I layed down of covering Jon's next gig so that you yourself can do a better job

Profile | Posted 31st May 2004 at 15:54   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

no

Profile | Posted 31st May 2004 at 20:11   back to article

Guided By Voices wrote...

Profile | Posted 31st May 2004 at 20:21   back to article

Dave LMS wrote...

Mike,

Ask, and ye shall have.

Dave

Profile | Posted 1st June 2004 at 22:40   back to article

performingchimp wrote...

Do

we

have

paragraphs

now?

Profile | Posted 2nd June 2004 at 01:28   back to article

performingchimp wrote...

Cool!!!!!!

Profile | Posted 2nd June 2004 at 01:29   back to article

Mike_Q wrote...

Dave is ace!

Dave is ace!

Paragragphs are better!

Profile | Posted 2nd June 2004 at 11:03   back to article

danmofo wrote...

Saw Jon @ the Snooty Fox yesterday ! Holy Shit....

MoFo...

Profile | Posted 7th June 2004 at 10:46   back to article

Siglacken wrote...

I'm definately gonna see Mr Gomm sometime this summer. shame he hasn't graced bradford yet with his presence. He's not the first artist to snub the dirty streets of bradford for the bright lights of leeds

Profile | Posted 7th June 2004 at 11:00   back to article

performingchimp wrote...

Can you blame him.

Actually, if someone would offer him a gig in Bradford he'd probly deffo do it.

I know him quie well. In the way that Clark Kent "knows" Superman. Except without the brylcreem and superpowers and high ethical standards.

Profile | Posted 9th June 2004 at 00:55   back to article

Siglacken wrote...

I'm sure you could play in my mate's garage. We couldn't pay you any money but you'd get a glass of apple juice and a bag of Frisps (not crisps) for your service. I could also gurantee an audience of at least 5. So you in?

Profile | Posted 9th June 2004 at 08:31   back to article

performingchimp wrote...

Can you make it Hula-hoops?

Profile | Posted 9th June 2004 at 11:59   back to article

Siglacken wrote...

HULA-HOOPS!!?? You're not Axel Rose. You can't go around making crazy demands like that or take 20 years to make a record.

Profile | Posted 9th June 2004 at 12:15   back to article

Mike_Q wrote...

Hula Hoops are great but how can you turn down Frisps? They are awesome and not so easy to track down these days!

Profile | Posted 9th June 2004 at 12:31   back to article

Siglacken wrote...

I know Frisps are amazing. I think it's just Mr Gomm on a power trip. No sane person would actually choose the delights of Frisps over the very average hula hoop range of crisp related snacks

Profile | Posted 9th June 2004 at 12:56   back to article

Mike_Q wrote...

You got that the wrong way round Si.

Silly Billy.

Profile | Posted 9th June 2004 at 13:03   back to article

Siglacken wrote...

Sorry. You see I'm so outraged by his comments that I'm unable to type correctly. "I think it's just Mr Gomm on a power trip. No sane person would actually choose the very average hula hoop range of crisp related snacks over the delights of Frisps."

Profile | Posted 9th June 2004 at 13:11   back to article

performingchimp wrote...

I expect hula-hoops, and i expect them arranged on a plate by order of circular-ness. any broken ones and i'm outta there

Profile | Posted 9th June 2004 at 15:09   back to article

Mike_Q wrote...

You gotta stick em all on your fingers though before eating them. None of this picking em up and shoving em in your moouth rubbish !

Profile | Posted 9th June 2004 at 15:15   back to article

Siglacken wrote...

Since Mr Gomm is a master of the guitar I propose a gig where he performs with hula hoops on every finger. I'm sure people would pay to see that.

Profile | Posted 9th June 2004 at 15:41   back to article

Siglacken wrote...

I knew he didn't have the balls to accept the challenge

Profile | Posted 10th June 2004 at 23:54   back to article

Post A Comment

Sorry, you must be signed in to post a comment.

Band Information

Read more about the bands that have been featured in this article.

Other Bands You Might Like

© 1998-2008 Dave Sugden | Credits | Privacy | Mobile Site.