Gig review of Tom Gourley + Benjamin Wetherill + Louise Dal + Fran Rodgers

Gig Date: Wednesday, 26th May 2004 | 681 page views.

Tom Gourley @ Royal Park Cellars

By Sam Saunders

A very full and very buzzing Royal Park Cellars had one hell of a night on Wednesday.

Agent provocateur Thomas R. Gourley rightly claimed the headline spot, choking up fiercely loud and wonderfully free guitar against a versatile and compelling voice. He comes at the audience with a pent up anger at the blandness of NME style "wock" and tells us "This is a night about song writing. I'd like to see the Von Bondies do a song solo and make it stick" . He flings his stuff against the back wall, and it does some damage. The wall, just about, and the songs, very definitely, stay upright throughout.

Swapping between two classic electric guitars, he regurgitates riffs and chords and decorative lines whenever it sounds right. They serve the songs, they don't define or constrain them. Mumbling like a Lour Reed, or swooping about like a choir boy he can sing for England anytime he wants. He really stirs things up, and pours so much invention and variety into that stark framework, that I know I'll have to see him again soon. I'm too bewildered to take it all in, and my ears are ringing with the volume. There's one stand out song that uses all his moves - its "a song for Bruce Renshaw", but maybe not called that. It is epic. And just when it couldn't get any better he slips in that astonishing falsetto that send the pitch up a couple of octaves without losing a shred of colour. Seek him out.

Benjamin Wetherill set the seriously professional tone with his neatly dressed set. The brown shoes, the striped suit trousers, the shirt and tie. The combed-back hair. His songs are done in a feathered lightness, with a precise and deliberate voice. They have a French chanson quality and a hint of the Noel Coward about them. Benjamin's previous life might have been serenading rich young virgins on ocean liners in the 1920s. He's so earnest and so sincere about it, though, it's a joy - definitely not a joke. His jazz guitar is dextrous and jaunty - only once launching into something meatier and sexier. There's a strong bass line from that trusty right thumb, and confidently fingered arpeggios make each of the songs dance. The audience are captivated and cheer like mad people being mad.

Louise Dal had come, at Tom Gourley's invitation, all the way from Denmark (albeit via Leeds and more recently Newcastle). Her performance is super-confident and luminous. She has a belting voice, and lets it rip on a set of very well made songs. She ain't no blushing maiden, neither. "I do this one when I'm busking" she confides - and then sings about shooting, running over and (well ... I was cowering by this stage ...something) a dodgy boyfriend. She has a very strong stage presence - and makes another Leeds appearance on July 3rd at the Vine with band Columbia Drive. Don't miss it.

The tricky opening spot was done by the craftsman singer-songwriter Fran Rodgers, denizen of The Grove. Fran is a pro in this acoustic guitar, "night about songs" game. She shifts between her own songs and some deft Joan Baez/Jonie Mitchell material. There's an electric piano song too. My personal favourite is the very true-sounding "So Out of Time With You" - an honest and engaging song about being a writer in the long long shadows cast by the greats. She sings with passion and grace. She is a talent.

Find related articles: , , , , .

Comments

Aubergine wrote...

I have to say that I thought Benjamin Wetherill is terrible. He's like a comedy version of how a singer/songwriter should act all ernest and overly serious.

I saw him play at the Brudenel Social and half of his songs were 1940's blues covers, people seemed impressed by this, as if it was sophisticated and bohemian, I just thought the guy was not the real deal AT ALL.

He's like an actor playing a part in a parody spoof film...

Profile | Posted 1st June 2004 at 23:57   back to article

arthurlee wrote...

I agree.

Profile | Posted 2nd June 2004 at 01:15   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

good job you two weren't writing the review then!

Profile | Posted 4th June 2004 at 10:24   back to article

Aubergine wrote...

?

Profile | Posted 5th June 2004 at 10:29   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

Yes I was a bit puzzled too. Which 1940s blues recordings did you have in mind?

Profile | Posted 5th June 2004 at 17:05   back to article

Aubergine wrote...

Razor sharp witt Sam...I was puzzled by the 1st comment you made as it didn't make any sense.

Profile | Posted 6th June 2004 at 01:49   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

I abbreviated the sentiment slightly, assuming that a finely developed musical distinction went along with a ready appreciation of lingusitic nuance ... but there you are. My full sentence would have read: "Given the views of Benjamin Wetherill expressed in the immediately preceding posts, it is just as well that the review was not written by Aubergine or authurlee. Had it been so, the review would not have been so favourably disposed to the artist in question." Now tell me about those 1940s blues recordings ...

Profile | Posted 6th June 2004 at 08:47   back to article

Aubergine wrote...

I take it your one of those people that always have to have the last word over everything...

Profile | Posted 7th June 2004 at 13:25   back to article

Dave LMS wrote...

Right or wrong, that's quite an interesting conclusion you have come to. You seek a response, and in getting one Sam asks you a question leaving you the opportunity to reply and answer. Not a prime example for someone wanting the last word... furthermore, you didn't answer his question I see.

Profile | Posted 7th June 2004 at 17:56   back to article

performingchimp wrote...

i want to know about the 1940's blues!!!!!!!! tell us!!! Goddamn, leaving people hanging.

What blues is there from the 40's? None in the second half cos of musician's strike and war. I'm going to go read some books. What a geek. Had charly records or chess records been founded by the 40's?

Profile | Posted 9th June 2004 at 01:00   back to article

Aubergine wrote...

OK well I think he's got past Robert Johnson and now he goes for more obscure ones with names like Howlin' Woody Wood Pecker and Big Jonnie Blue, etc

Profile | Posted 9th June 2004 at 10:44   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

You are an ignorant little vegetable aren't you, Aubergine? If you want to make smart arsed coments it's a good idea to be a bit more smart and a bit less of an arse.

Profile | Posted 10th June 2004 at 21:07   back to article

performingchimp wrote...

Yes, those old blues guys sure had some silly names! Sadly you don't seem to know what any of them were.

I thought your complaint was that he didn't come across as genuine, but it must have been a personality thing, rather than a music thing. Which is equally important, don't get me wrong. I'm definitely gonna be checking him out, though.

Profile | Posted 10th June 2004 at 23:10   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

Sorry for being so rude (and badly spelt) in that last message. The very idea that BW plays blues is so laughable that I was unable to maintain my usual sang froid. Perhaps the vegetable person caught a certain Davy Graham via Bert Jansch inflection in his Ray Charles (RIP) style bass lines. (you know AA,GG,FF,EE played with the right thumb while i,m and a twiddle about on the top three strings ... da daddla daa ...) Anyway, he'll probably pop back with the technical words for all this. I think Ray Charles was around in the 40s - but BW (of course) does not look, sound or play even a bit like Ray Charles. Hit the Road Jack, as they say.

Profile | Posted 11th June 2004 at 07:11   back to article

Aubergine wrote...

Yes Sam your message was very rude and you tried your best to be personally insulting however your apology is accepted.

I have seen BW twice and also have his CD. When I saw him live he covered about 4 songs that were done before the fifties, these were as far as I know old blues numbers and even if they weren't in MY opinion that is too many covers.

As performing chimp says, my original point, which has sadly been missed, was that BW was in MY opinion incredibly clichéd and was not what I considered to be the real deal.

From the comments made sadly Sam doesn't seem to be able to come to terms with the fact that people may have different opinions which don't always concur with his own.

Profile | Posted 11th June 2004 at 18:47   back to article

Dave LMS wrote...

That's not how it reads to me...

Profile | Posted 11th June 2004 at 18:54   back to article

Post A Comment

Sorry, you must be signed in to post a comment.

Band Information

Read more about the bands that have been featured in this article.

© 1998-2008 Dave Sugden | Credits | Privacy | Mobile Site.