Gig review of Being 747 + The Breech + Transparent Things + Xi + Johnny's In The Basement

Gig Date: Friday, 29th October 2004 | 788 page views.

Being 747 @ HiFi Club

By Tom Goodhand

Ahhh, you can't beat a bit of a shuffle in the late afternoon, and this month Mr. Rob Paul Chapman's showcase again failed to disappoint. Oli Samsa opened proceedings, but unfortunately I missed him whilst waiting around to interview Chas and Dave at the City Varieties (who were apparently running too late to be interviewed). Anyway that means that my evening was kicked off by Johnny's In The Basement. The band's Dylan-quoting name suggested a somewhat retrospective sound, and sure enough, we got an occasionally folky, often proggy and largely entertaining act. Even if the songs bit start to go on a bit.

Due to Rob's, erm, eclectic taste when picking out bands for the TTS, Xi played next. Xi are, in the words of Steve Kind, 'proper rock'. I assume that that means that the guitars chug, the drums pound away, and the bass makes that kind of clicking, distorted sound that can become a bit annoying. I assume this because this is what Xi do. The only problem, they don't do it particularly well, and only the frontman's exceptional voice (that can veer from Matt Bellamy-esque falsettos to throaty growls) saves them from becoming as turgid as the masturbatory guitar lines that keep getting spun out.

Just as you think it's gone off the boil though, London-boys Transparent Things arrive and do their take on that trendy indie garage rock thing. They all look the part (the guitarist even wears and blazer and sweatbands), and even are so bold as to sound the part. It's angular Strokesey rock that has tunes aplenty and a nice little swagger to. You see, Leeds ain't the only place that can make good bands.

That isn't to say that Leeds isn't making good bands though, take The Breech. They make that kind of noisy, yet also melodic form of pop that overtakes your eyes. 'Digging Holes' uses an excellent vocal effect and an endearingly simple guitar line and, like the rest of the band's set is hugely entertaining and overwhelming stuff, if not slightly unoriginal.

For some reason, the end of The Breech's set also becomes the end of the gig for a hefty chunk of the TTS's fanbase, which means that Being 747 emerge onto the stage in a worryingly muted fashion. The band clearly don't give a shit however. Dave still turns up with a papier-mâché plane on his head and still plays around with the air raid siren. Steve still throws out all those rock poses whilst achieving the feat of playing both the keyboards and bass at once. All three members still remember the importance of nice harmonies and a good old 'ahhhh' in the chorus. So, 'The Girl Who Fell Asleep...' opens the set, and is pure pop brilliance. It should be a hit. It won't be, but it so should be. Then there's 'DIY', surely the only rock song ever to namecheck NHS Online, 'Communist Prince', 'Target Practice', heck the whole lot. Each one is a short, fun blast of melody, clever riffs and catchy synths. The only shame is that the set ends with no 'Use Your Friends' and no 'Weathergirl', still, if a band can sound this triumphant without songs of that quality, you know they have something rather special.

Find related articles: , , , , .

Comments

Davoc_The_Breech wrote...

Cheers for the review! Anyone who would like a FREE CD of us, please email thebreech@hotmail.com with your name, address and email and we'll post you one straight away! Also go to our web site for more gigs/information/reviews/news etc www.thebreech.com. Cheers!

Profile | Posted 3rd November 2004 at 10:55   back to article

Davoc_The_Breech wrote...

p.s. I too was gutted more people didn't stay to see Being 747, they were excelent!

Profile | Posted 3rd November 2004 at 10:57   back to article

tomas311 wrote...

Yeah, they were rather marvellous, damn those fickle fans of yours!
Oh, and I have the CD, and it is ace, so e-mail them

Profile | Posted 3rd November 2004 at 11:14   back to article

Paul Wrath wrote...

Hello! Paul from Being 747 here. Yes, we really enjoyed the entire evening's proceedings - I think the lack of entheusiastic audience had something to do with the fact that we didn't really sell that many tickets!
One thing did mar the evening for us though - A girl in the audience dissapeared with our model plane head. As most of the people at the gig were ticket-buyers from each of the bands, there may be a good chance that someone might know who it was who took off (pardon the pun) with our plane head. We'd really like it back. Does anyone know anything?

Thanks,

Paul.

Profile | Posted 3rd November 2004 at 12:09   back to article

TMitH(Steve Kind) wrote...

Hmmm! - well, I'm not going to argue with the review of Xi - It is after all one man's opinion. Just for some balance though - the band sold 20 singles on the strength of their performance at TTS & were complimented on their set by many members of the audience who were not known to them.

So - that makes it at least 20 to 1 in my book Tom

Profile | Posted 3rd November 2004 at 17:45   back to article

Mr Neil wrote...

Petty.

Profile | Posted 3rd November 2004 at 20:43   back to article

tomas311 wrote...

I was aware that people liked em. They seemed to go down well. I just really don't 'get' that kind of sound, it bores me a bit. Still, well done for selling stuff!

Profile | Posted 3rd November 2004 at 22:21   back to article

Noah Baby Food wrote...

Are you 10 Steve?

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 01:30   back to article

Noah Baby Food wrote...

That last comment, that was slightly tongue in cheek, was not by Noah, it was by me, Chris. Didn't realise you had to log in from the message board and out again for this etc, I am cack with computers. Many apologies for all concerned.

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 01:33   back to article

TMitH(Steve Kind) wrote...

I really don't understand what is "petty" or childish about adding some information to give a more balanced picture. I remember a thread on the discussion board that went on and on & got quite vitriolic when someone was less than complementary about Baby Food (who, before anyone starts, I personally think are rather good live).

Writing a fair and balanced review, while retaining a critical standpoint is a very difficult thing to do - which is why I rarely attempt it - but I thought the whole point of having a "discussion" feature here was for people to respond to articles, add releavnt information etc. which is all that I did - and attempted to do in a friendly way by sticking a smiley on the end.

If I'd added a comment saying "Yeah, they were crap" - would that have been childish or petty?
;)

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 09:52   back to article

Michael Q wrote...

But to say your comment was intended to add 'balance' isn't quite right given that you manage the band Steve. It's like saying Goebbels was just trying to 'balance' the negative press Britain and the US gave Hitler.

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 10:08   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

I think tmith's comment was both balanced and balancing in the best possible way. Especially as he was mentioned by name in the review. The comments about his comment - especially the one referring to Joseph Goebbels are plain silly.

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 10:30   back to article

Michael Q wrote...

It was supposed to be tongue in cheek, hence the smily face.

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 10:40   back to article

Mark Sturdy wrote...

Hi everyone.

Everyone who has posted so far in this thread is right and everything is brilliant.

Did you all like Transparent Things? I did. I'd direct you to their website but it doesn't quite exist at the moment, so check out their old one at http://www.rosetech.co.uk/cling/site/ and leave messages on their messageboard.

You can also email them at clingmanagement@o2.co.uk. Houpla.

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 10:45   back to article

TMitH(Steve Kind) wrote...

Transparent Things were indeed excellent!

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 11:01   back to article

Chris Catalyst wrote...

I have to reiterate, I was being somewhat tongue in cheek. Just thought it was funny really... the 20 to 1 bit.

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 11:19   back to article

Mark Sturdy wrote...

Tongue in cheek. What an odd phrase.

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 11:36   back to article

Michael Q wrote...

Everyone should try talking with their tongue literally in their cheek for a day. It's fun.

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 11:42   back to article

rpc loqui wrote...

Hello Everyone.

Thanks for the positive feedback on the evening. I had a great time. To be honest, I didn't notice that many people leaving after the Breech. I was down the front for the vast majority of Being 747 and thought it looked packed, although I don't know how far back it went. Occasionally the audience might wane a bit towards the end, but this is usually more to do with drunken fatigue than lack of enthusiasm!

People I spoke to really enjoyed Being 747 (although I was personally a bit disappointed that there was no Swingball and the Mrs wanted to hear Use Your Friends - still, you can't please all of the people all of the time!) Anyway, thanks to all those who played, and to all those who came down to watch.

You might be interested to know that including staff and bands we had 383 people in on Friday (just 17 people under fire capacity and technically a sell-out), so thanks so much to all involved, I had a great time, and an even greater hangover the next day!

This month (26th) you can get another dose of the Morricones for anyone suffering Wrath withdrawal in the intervening four weeks with The Scaramanga Six who will be fresh (or otherwise) from a very high profile support slot for Cardiacs at the London Astoria next week. Plus The Touch from Bradford, Sunways the magnificent power three-piece from South Africa, the semi-operatic prog-influenced theatrics of The Butterfly, Rent who I like to think of as The Polyphonic Spree's evil twin and the dirty (in a good way) blues-rock of The Nervous Shakedown. See you there!

Cheers, Rob.

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 12:37   back to article

Mr Neil wrote...

I'm sorry, i stand by what i said, and this isn't tongue in cheek. If you get a bad review, fucking live with it. Don't turn round and try and negate it by bragging about how many singles you sold. You might as well be denying that westlife were shit on top of the pops, because they've sold loads of records. I know that you'd be a pretty shit manager if you didn't stand up for your boys, Steve, but i'd rather see a bit more decency and acceptance with stuff like that. Wouldn't want to get into Paranova territory now would we.

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 12:49   back to article

daz xi wrote...

Hi,
I don't post very often but I've got sod all to do at work and I would like to throw my gloves in the ring. Not, however, my teddy out of the cot.
If one is to be reviewed, one must be prepared to take a panning. That's life. I don't agree with the review personally (suprise, suprise) but I respect Tom's right to write it. I will however, take the response of the audience into account above the review, because that is the only thing that really matters.
I don't, however, respect Hanson's right to poke his nose in where it's not needed. This is nothing to do with anything sensible but is more to do with the fact that I don't like him very much. Now that's childish.
Luv on y'all.

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 13:06   back to article

daz xi wrote...

Oh, and by the way Tom, cheers for the comments about me pipes. Much appreciated.

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 13:11   back to article

Mr Neil wrote...

You don't like me. Shit, I love all you chaps. I am now heartbroken. In fact no, of course i'm not. Your band is terrible and so is your manager and so is your venue. All the worst for the future you muso wankers.

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 14:11   back to article

daz xi wrote...

Muso, Moi?
Hanson, I'm as hamfisted as you are! (well, maybe not quite ;-))
I would love to start trading insults with you but I have better things to do with my life. Such as stare at the wall and pick my nose.

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 14:45   back to article

Davoc_The_Breech wrote...

mmmm bop ba ba do de dooo bop a diddly doo daaa mmmm bop a di a dah dooooo yeaahhh...sorry, who's hanson other than that fantastic long haired kid pop band from a while back?? -obligatory tongue in cheek face

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 15:50   back to article

tomas311 wrote...

Hanson is Mr Neil Hanson. I don't believe he played any role in the creation of MmmBop, although you never know. Perhaps the shaved head is an attempt to escape his past?

Profile | Posted 4th November 2004 at 15:54   back to article

rpc loqui wrote...

Davok, that post made me laugh out loud. And I'm at work. And that's not a good thing!

Profile | Posted 5th November 2004 at 12:37   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

Mr Neil's permanent problem is how to escape from the present ...

Profile | Posted 5th November 2004 at 14:49   back to article

Mr Neil wrote...

Erm, thanks.

Profile | Posted 5th November 2004 at 16:23   back to article

Post A Comment

Sorry, you must be signed in to post a comment.

Band Information

Read more about the bands that have been featured in this article.

Other Bands You Might Like

© 1998-2008 Dave Sugden | Credits | Privacy | Mobile Site.