Gig review of iLiKETRAiNS + O Fracas + Xi + Buen Chico + Unexploded Shells

Gig Date: Friday, 2nd September 2005 | 1,097 page views.

iLiKETRAiNS @ HiFi Club

By Gavin Miller

Once again, it's that time of the month (no, not that one) but the one in which the whole of Leeds descends on the small but perfectly formed Hi-Fi club for the biggest (and longest) party in town. This is the Tea Time Shuffle, kids.

First up on tonight's excellent looking bill are Unexploded Shells, a kind of perky power pop band, with lots of grinding guitars, awkward lyrics and bouncy drums. Not bad, but maybe a few months down the line, they'll be on top of their game. It was a strong start though, and seeing as how the band consists of both Mr. Goodhand and Mr. Sturdy, I'll quit while I'm ahead...

Next up Buen Chico come bounding onto the stage with their even perkier power pop, but with bouncier drums and crazier guitar work. It was a nice change and a breath of air for everyone waiting for the headliners tonight, something to bounce along inanely too before things get a bit too heavy. In a word, they were ace.

After a well-earned beer break, Xi (that's pronounced "Z-eye" apparently) are on, with their atmospheric synths, programmed beats and loud, Tool-esque guitar lines, they were very interesting indeed. Certainly a nice change and a testimonial to just how eclectic these nights can be, Xi were a bit more metal and a bit less arty than the ever approaching headlining band, but still made for an interesting listen, and one that was well worth it.

O Fracas. There are no more words that anyone in Leeds can say about them, because in all probability, they've already been said. A frenzied mash up of Franz Ferdinand style angular new wave, and crazy art house funk a la Mars Volta's more sanity depraved moments, O Fracas certainly have a unique sound. Still, they put on a good show, and the crowd were very much appreciative.

And then, yes, it's time, the big one, the band everyone in Leeds loves, the band that are going to go huge, the band... oh enough foreplay, it's iLiKETRAiNS.

Epic, sweeping slabs of melancholic guitar float over Dave's baritone drawl before being pulped by Simon's massive, booming drums, all set to projections to the right of the stage by Ashley, who also braps his cornet once in a while too. And that's just the first song.

Obviously post-rock, but absolutely amazing, iLiKETRAiNS yearn and croon like no-one else in the city can do at the moment, building each song around simple yet effective guitar lines into huge great swathes of harsh guitar noise, the band are just on fire, and boy do they know it. The crowd roars as Dave suggests "are you going to applaud everything I say?" jokingly.

"Rob, can we do one more? Even if it's nine minutes long?" Yeah, they know it, we know it, and everyone who saw them knows it. They're going fucking huge.

Find related articles: , , , , .

Comments

instantrick wrote...

"the band everyone in Leeds loves"??? Just standing up to be counted as they don't float my boat. So you may need to revise that statment....sugest "the band everyone in the Leeds scene bubble loves". Like my Mrs Gran hasn't heard of them and she's lived in Leeds all her life, then there's those other 2000 people I know, what were their names again? In short Gav, calm down dear it's just a gig. (We can't feel all superior condemming the NMEs hype-shite and then start ourselves)

Profile | Posted 12th September 2005 at 12:55   back to article

mattdrummer wrote...

Unexploded Shells are shit, and you shouldn't have held back from saying so. It's no good for them or anyone else if people hold back from giving them the sort of criticism they'd get from someone who didn't know them.

There's some potential there but they're 6 months to a year away even from being competent, let alone anything more. No offence meant, and they could easily make me eat my words given a couple of years, but it's annoying as there are literally 50 better bands in Leeds who have to suffer shit reviews and can't get good support slots, while this lot seem to get preferential treatment.

Profile | Posted 12th September 2005 at 20:31   back to article

Big Stu wrote...

I think that's a little harsh and totally uncalled for. So you don't like them, that's your business but there's no need to call them shit, to be honest it just sounds like sour grapes and makes you appear very bitter. If you haven't got anything constructive to say then keep your mouth shut.

Profile | Posted 13th September 2005 at 09:16   back to article

Mark Sturdy wrote...

Just a few things you might want to know Mattdrummer...

"no good for them or anyone else if people hold back from giving them the sort of criticism they'd get from someone who didn't know them" - I think that's rather patronising. We've had our share of good and bad reviews, but we don't really need you to decide what is or isn't good for us thanks.

If Gav thought we were shit (and I don't know if he did or not), then I would't have a problem with him saying so. The more honest the better as far as I'm concerned.

"Someone who didn't know them" - I wouldn't say I knew Gav really. I've met him twice and had the briefest of conversations with him both times. As far as I'm aware no one else in the band knows him either.

"Preferential treatment" - bollocks. If we get the odd decent gig (and first-on at the TTS isn't THAT special, as you'll note if you look back through the website and see who else has played it), it's because we're prepared to take a bit of initiative and put a bit of legwork in. It might be true that because a couple of us have been involved in Sandman we've sometimes have a lead on who to ask (although probably not as much as you think), but it still comes down to getting on the phone, sending emails and giving out CDs. If promoters don't like us there's nothing stopping them saying no. What do you want us to do, insist on playing nothing but bottom-of-the-bill at the Cardi Arms for the rest of our lives?

Profile | Posted 13th September 2005 at 19:01   back to article

gav_poindexter wrote...

@ instantrick: when i said "the band everyone in leeds loves" i was making a point about how much press and attention the band are getting now, i didn't mean literally EVERYONE in leeds loves them, as you say, that would be silly.
i was also trying to imitate rob paul chapman's over enthusiastic, but always entertaining intros to bands at TTS.
sorry for the misunderstanding.

Profile | Posted 14th September 2005 at 14:42   back to article

mattdrummer wrote...

Mark - I make no apologies for being patronising, especially when you agree with me about my point.

But I do apologise for the the preferential treatment bit and the unnecessary bitching. Sorry.

The reason I got annoyed was it really did seem like the reviewer had held back from giving his true opinion and that wound me up. But whether the writer did or didn't hold back his opinion is no fault of the band, obviously, so I shouldn't have direction my frustration at them.

Big Stu - my mouth will remain very much open, regardless of what comes out. We don't need censors thanks very much.

Profile | Posted 14th September 2005 at 19:14   back to article

Big Stu wrote...

Matt - I wasn't impying that we did need censors, please feel free to keep using your mouth without first consulting your brain.

Profile | Posted 15th September 2005 at 08:50   back to article

instantrick wrote...

@ Gav - Got to say it really doesn't come accross like that...may be a rephrasing for next time. No need for an apology sir!

Profile | Posted 15th September 2005 at 08:52   back to article

Sam Robson wrote...

press like iliketrains a lot I think, but they seem to split opinion with most people I'd say. not a bad thing. probo a good thing. gets people talking about them.

Profile | Posted 15th September 2005 at 18:25   back to article

TomCusic wrote...

"Any publicity is good publicity, as long as they spell my name right"


-some guy I can't remember

Profile | Posted 15th September 2005 at 22:36   back to article

LewisD wrote...

Seems like an idea to add my points...

"MattDrummer" is an extremely talented musician and as such I'm sure his views are more than valid, though I would agree that the word 'shit' was maybe a little uncalled for. Constructive criticism all the way, people.

However, I can see the point. I completely sympathise with the whole thing of seeing a band that is blatantly rubbish getting a good review somewhere, when you just *know* the reviewer is wrong. It's frustrating.

And, well, that's all I needed to say.

Profile | Posted 18th September 2005 at 10:04   back to article

LewisD wrote...

Actually just looked at who is in Unexploded Shells and, given that it contains Tom 'Slate bands for comedy value' Goodhand, I think Matt's comment was a decent one.

(Note: Tom, if you read this, the above comment was tongue-in-cheek.)

Profile | Posted 18th September 2005 at 10:06   back to article

gav_poindexter wrote...

wow, it's nice to see people are actually reading my reviews.
cool.
maybe i should've been a bit harder on unexploded shells, but as me and chris from larusso were saying once... when reviewing, "there's no need to be a cunt about it"

Profile | Posted 18th September 2005 at 13:29   back to article

tomas311 wrote...

Heh, cheers Lewis...

Actually, I hope it can be noted that I have toned down my reviews recently. I don't think I've been particularly EVIL for a long time. I started to feel like a bit of a cunt, and thought that I was being over vicious at times.

However, I stand by the fact that some of the slatings I gave were well deserved.

Profile | Posted 18th September 2005 at 18:06   back to article

LewisD wrote...

I think *all* the slatings you gave were well deserved. It was just the way you went about them that occasionally made me turn my nose up.

Still, your review of The Noise gave us a few laughs down the pub.

PS. Spot on with your review of our last EP. Incidentally, we didn't sack the singer, but he's got better now anyway. ;)

Keep up the humour, man.

Profile | Posted 18th September 2005 at 21:22   back to article

tomas311 wrote...

Sorry Lewis, but what band are you in? I can't remember who I told to sack their singer...

Yeah, I think you summed up what I was trying to say. I started being a bastard when slagging bands off, when I could have been somewhat less unpleasant. For a while I've been doing my best to stay away from doing that, because i realised i was being a bit twattish (with local stuff at least, I reserve the right to be as nasty about James Blunt as I wish).

Profile | Posted 19th September 2005 at 00:35   back to article

daz xi wrote...

Leave Blunt alone you bully.

Profile | Posted 19th September 2005 at 11:01   back to article

LewisD wrote...

Tom: Mr. Charming.

Though you had a point. That recording was *terrible*...

Profile | Posted 19th September 2005 at 23:16   back to article

tomas311 wrote...

Ahh, i thought you might be Mr Charming, I didn't want to say, in case you weren't and i inadvertenly started another debate.

Profile | Posted 20th September 2005 at 08:49   back to article

LewisD wrote...

Nah, it's cool. Our new demo should have landed on Dave's doorstep this morning, anyway. Will be interesting to see what the reception is to this one. Personally, I think it's a mile better.

Profile | Posted 20th September 2005 at 15:10   back to article

Post A Comment

Sorry, you must be signed in to post a comment.

Band Information

Read more about the bands that have been featured in this article.

Other Bands You Might Like

© 1998-2008 Dave Sugden | Credits | Privacy | Mobile Site.