Gig review of Simple Kid + Black Wire + Komakino

Gig Date: Friday, 26th September 2003 | 589 page views.

Simple Kid @ Joseph's Well

By Cathy Simpson

There's a lot of competition for our attention in Leeds this evening, there's the Wannadies with Mommy and Daddy at the Cockpit, there's a whole city filled with vulnerable teens pissing mum and dad's money up the wall in fresh meat week, and best of all there's the episode of Eastenders before the one where Dirty Den comes back. So why then should I bother trekking over to Joseph's Well to see some bands when I could be doing (sic) one of the above?

Komakino do little to provide a satisfactory answer to the question, and the unnecessary view of around 3 inches of the singers arse crack every time he turns around and bends down (for some reason he does this a LOT) makes me long for the comforting sight of the Queen Vic. Apart from this the onstage movement is minimal and it becomes apparent that various band members must have the music printed on the back of their eyelids- open them up boys, the crowd weren't that ugly.

There are some alright moments, not least the drumming throughout the whole set which is really good, but also some rock and roll mike throwing and freaking out from the frontman. Sadly the latter is immediately followed by gratuitous apologies from said frontman thus quashing the effect. Oh well, nearly.

To summarise, Komakino were playing next to a poster which said 'gash', you do the math.

Next are Black Wire, but what I want to know is, who thought it was a good idea to put them, self-confessed bad ass zombie motherfucka's, on the same bill 'Dido of garage'TM, Simple Kid?

Black Wire play an intense set with the band all trying to get in the same square metre of stage giving the effect of a flailing, three-headed rock stick insect, with hair. A highlight comes with singer Dan getting off stage and screaming in the face the ugly, balding piss-head who's dancing at the front like a twat - you know the kind of person I mean, they're so pissed they think every song is for them and they're feeling every beat, when really they look like a shit, go Dan.

Despite bemused looks from the peaceful Simple Kid fans wearing their cosy hoodies Black Wire don't dilute it one bit and it's pretty clear that no one, band or audience is really enjoying themselves, but fuck it, Black Wire are going to rape your ears anyway. Sweet.

Finally it's the trucker cap wearing 'Dido of garage'TM, Simple Kid. Like Dido Simple Kid is talented when it comes to writing songs but like her, he is also really annoying. He's not American, but seems convinced he is, he calls his band his bitches (I don't think Dido does the last one, but I wouldn't be surprised).

It's easy to imagine Simple Kid going down very nicely on a Saturday afternoon at Glastonbury, but here in the dingy back room of a pub he just gets my back up. He's one man with his flying V and his angst, but what I want to know is, why should we care? After watching Black Wire Attack Attack Attack, it's hard to get enthusiastic about a faux-American singing about what he thinks of the Samuel L Jackson Barclays ad.

Find related articles: , , , , .

Comments

Mike_Q wrote...

Black Wire were terrible.
Simple Kid was awesome.

Ain't taste a funny thang !

Profile | Posted 28th September 2003 at 18:50   back to article

Dave LMS wrote...

The ugly balding guy at the front sounded like me. Only I wasn't there. Nor do I dance. I've read a few Black Wire reviews now and they all sound really positive, and Whiskas played me a storming track he had. Really good. But that's all I know really, I haven't had chance to get out and see them.

Profile | Posted 28th September 2003 at 18:54   back to article

Cathy1981 wrote...

Black Wire made me smile, Simple Kid made me yawn. Black Wire had fake 'Nam war wounds, Simple Kid had a trucker cap.
Black Wire look like anorexic futuristic rent boys, Simple Kid looks like someone's skinny older brother who's just got his first girlfriend.

That is all.

Profile | Posted 29th September 2003 at 11:57   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

I wasn't there either! The rumour I heard was that Black Wire were a buch of hip looking kids who hung around dodgy venues so much that someone said "are you a band?", and they said "err ... like ...no" And person number one said, "Well you look like you ought to be. Believe me, I'm a music industry professional" That is all.

Profile | Posted 29th September 2003 at 12:28   back to article

Mike_Q wrote...

Simple Kid could sing and had a band that could play their instruments. That is all.

Profile | Posted 29th September 2003 at 19:22   back to article

woodyallen wrote...

Erm, when did the fact that a band can "sing and play their instruments" become the primary and crucial concern? Sorry, I just thought that a bit of a "dad" thing to say". Byeeee.

Profile | Posted 29th September 2003 at 22:22   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

How many layers in your irony Mr Allen? Are you dumb, or mocking the dumb? Can't tell. So the STRAIGHT answer is that using music to achieve the intended communication is always the primary and crucial concern for me (and possibly many others, if not yet for a majority). It has been since about 1956 when I first head Elvis Presley. I think this is even more so for Mike_Q, but he's very young. This is, all said and done, a Music website. It says so at the top of the page. This message was last edited on 29/09/03 22.48:16

Profile | Posted 29th September 2003 at 22:47   back to article

woodyallen wrote...

Yes, I'm mocking you. I wasn't actually at this gig, but I was just referring to Mike Q's previous comment that one band was better than another due to, what I summated from his comment, their technical proficiency. I know, and I'm sure you know, that this isn't what makes a good live show, or indeed a good artist/band. A huge amount of things participate to this apart from technical proficiency. Having something to say, and the compulsion and need to say it. Having passion and confidence and determination etc. I don't know why I bother reading this to be honest, every time you make a comment, there's some Big Brother on your trail, to cut you down like you've invaded their personal space or summat. When Elvis Presley was first seen on TV screens singing Heartbreak Hotel in 1956, I'm sure people didn't think "oh! he can sing and play his instrument!". They were shocked by the originality and immediacy of what swivelling about on their tv screens. If I want technical proficiency I'll go and listen to Steve Vai or some other nonsense. That is not all, I presume.

Profile | Posted 29th September 2003 at 23:03   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

There's no need to be worried - each post gets a reply. That's what you call conversation, and some disagreement, conflict, difference is a natural part of that. I don't think anyone will disagree with you that sheer technical virtuosity can be counterproductive. As musicians and music fans we all understand that the whole communication effort involves the what and the why as well as the how. But within that range of what's understood I think it's well worth shouting out loud at certain points that many acts are just so woefully ill-equipped on the technical music side that their whole performance is undermined. Sadly this is just as (more, even?) true in the indie/creative/rock side of things as it is in the "manufactured" end of Pete Watermanland. I think the suggestion has been that Black Wire exemplify that trend. I don't know, I haven't seen them yet. But I do know musicians who have. You're wrong about Elvis Presley in 1956 by the way. He could, and we did. Very few people in England will have seen him on TV at that stage. Why the jibe at Steve Vai? His technical proficiency is extreme, I grant you. But why assume that other musicians or listeners would not appreciate that and also enjoy his sheer expressive joy in the music? There's as much pleasure in hearing him play as there is in the primitive one chord thundering of Ted Hawkins. You just need the ears and the openness.This message was last edited on 30/09/03 7.23:34

Profile | Posted 30th September 2003 at 07:20   back to article

Cathy1981 wrote...

Right, believe half of what you hear and none of what you read.
You're both going on utter speculaation. Get your ass to a gig then get your ass an opinion.
That, from me, really is all.

Profile | Posted 30th September 2003 at 12:11   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

The whole point of discussing lots of music on a website is that it's impossible to see it all, and we need some reliable and trustworthy guides to help the sorting process. Your review was really helpful in that respect. It was well written and clear in its approach and I'm pretty confident that I can go see other bands and not worry about Black Wire or Simple Kid, who both read as though they would not suit me at all. So obviously I think you're completely wrong about the credibility of the written word. The digression about technical proficiency was just that - a digression, sparked off by a comment on your review, but not really relevant to the acts concerned. This message was last edited on 30/09/03 13.22:56

Profile | Posted 30th September 2003 at 13:22   back to article

Noah Baby Food wrote...

Hey! Nice review, great stuff. i'm liking reference to "ugly balding pisshead". Next time I'll be sure to show my appreciation in a polite, ordered fashion and be less damn ugly while i'm at it...i've got some nerve eh...sorry and that. daaamn.

Profile | Posted 30th September 2003 at 17:19   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

Noah ... things on board two at a time ... we seem to have a theme running here. When does it start raining?

Profile | Posted 30th September 2003 at 18:33   back to article

Terrence Chipchase wrote...

One thing Black Wire are good at is getting people to talk about them, be it positive or negative. One thing they're bad it is music, but I guess people will buy into their style while it's still in style. Simple Kid's album sounds great, the gig was pretty good but not a patch on the recorded sound. That is all.

Profile | Posted 1st October 2003 at 15:38   back to article

herbert_lemon wrote...

i think black wire are model wannabees. they spend half the set doing their hair! but i spose they are doing something right if we are talking about them this much! Good luck to em'!This message was last edited on 07/10/03 15.43:17

Profile | Posted 7th October 2003 at 15:41   back to article

Sam Saunders wrote...

why concede that getting talked about is worth anything? Isn't that part of the Sick Celebrity Syndrome that afflicts us? Famous for being famous? It makes me ill. It's what leaves us with crap like Kylie, Dido and Robbie Williams.

Profile | Posted 7th October 2003 at 21:31   back to article

Terrence Chipchase wrote...

We're dealing with a music Business which unfortunately rewards acts for their profile far more than for the music they make, because, like any business, it is the publicity which sells, not the product. In most cases hype is generated for all the wrong reasons, almost to the point where I will immediately doubt a band if they have a buzz or whatever about them. This is a shame in light of the many musicians who are making great music without much recognition, obscured by others who are judged on anything but the merit of their music. It's a sad state of affairs.

Profile | Posted 9th October 2003 at 14:02   back to article

Post A Comment

Sorry, you must be signed in to post a comment.

Band Information

Read more about the bands that have been featured in this article.

Other Bands You Might Like

© 1998-2008 Dave Sugden | Credits | Privacy | Mobile Site.